First Stones

The shaving cream pie thrower invading the Murdoch questioning could easily have had more lethal intent (at which point I’d guess Mrs. Murdoch would have pulled out her uzi). Did the members of Parliament hold themselves responsible for this gaffe? Was it the fault of the head of the police assigned to the inquiry? Was it the Prime Minister’s fault? Is it the Queen’s fault, since she heads the empire?

Of course not. Then how is it that they expect Murdoch or his (extremely underwhelming) son to be cognizant of and responsible for some employees within his own empire hacking phones?


2 thoughts on “First Stones

  1. I’m not sure the analogy holds, Alan. This security breach was a single incident. Murdoch’s reporters (and editors) engaged in repeated, unethical and illegal behaviors over a long period of time, working in an environment that encouraged and rewarded such behaviors.

    If the were a pattern of repeated security breaches in Parliament over many months because of a culture of laxity, I would expect that higher-ups–although not the PM or the queen–would be held accountable.

  2. The complicity of the police at Scotland Yard was over a similarly long time. So what’s the difference? Should the Prime Minister resign for not having seen it, until the head of Scotland Yard had to throw himself on his sword? There is a point where you assign competent people and trust them. That’s what Murdoch senior claims he did. I see no evidence at this point to the contrary, though I can’t say that about his unpleasant son.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 × 5 =